Dites-moi en quoi les fonds rapatries par les immigres vers leur pays d'origine doivent-ils interesser la France?
Savez-vous combien de milliards de dollars sont rapatries chaque annee par les immigres grecs, juifs, turcs, kurdes, indiens et autres des Etats-Unis vers leurs pays d'origine?
Est ce comparable avec ce que les Africains de France (ce petit pays a l'echelle des USA) RAPATRIENT chez eux?
Ce n'est pas pour autant que les USA, la Grande Bretagne ou le Japon m'immiscent dans ces mechanismes.
Voici la verite: la France a compris que la manne des immigrants vers leur pays d'origine, notamment en Afrique, est de loin superieur a l'aide au developpement. Or l'aide au developpement constitue une arnaque pour assujetir un pays pauvre a des conditionnalites qui plombe son developpement. Alors, la france cherche a controller ce mechanisme d'une facon ou d'une autre. Voici sa motivation.
Reveiilez mes chers freres et soeurs Africains ! Ne laisser ni la France, ni la BAD, ni le FIDA controler les mechanismes de tranfert des fonds des immigres vers leur pays d'origine. C'est une arnaque et c'est une tactique interessee de la France, cette nation pie-voleuse caracterisee par ses intrigues malefiques, pour controler les fonds qui entrent dans nos pays pour les assujetir a des conditionalites fiscales et monetaires (voire le minable mechanisme de retention des exportations des pays membres de la ZONE Franc CFA (BCEAO, BEAC, BANQUE DE COMORES, DJIBOUTI ET MADASGASCAR). La France vient de constater que les transferts des migrants Africains vont sauver les finances de ses pays et elle veut saper ces mechanismes. Ne soyons plus naifs, les transferts sont bons comme ils sont, la competition emanant des africains eux-memes dans ce secteur reglera le probleme des couts. Mefiance.
Reveiilez mes chers freres et soeurs Africains ! Ne laisser ni la France, ni la BAD, ni le FIDA controler les mechanismes de tranfert des fonds des immigres vers leur pays d'origine. C'est une arnaque et c'est une tactique interessee de la France, cette nation pie-voleuse caracterisee par ses intrigues malefiques, pour controler les fonds qui entrent dans nos pays pour les assujetir a des conditionalites fiscales et monetaires (voire le minable mechanisme de retention des exportations des pays membres de la ZONE Franc CFA (BCEAO, BEAC, BANQUE DE COMORES, DJIBOUTI ET MADASGASCAR). La France vient de constater que les transferts des migrants Africains vont sauver les finances de ses pays et elle veut saper ces mechanismes. Ne soyons plus naifs, les transferts sont bons comme ils sont, la competition emanant des africains eux-memes dans ce secteur reglera le probleme des couts. Mefiance.
Dites-moi en quoi les fonds rapatries par les immigres vers leur pays d'origine doivent-ils interesser la France?
Savez-vous combien de milliards de dollars sont rapatries chaque annee par les immigres grecs, juifs, turcs, kurdes, indiens et autres des Etats-Unis vers leurs pays d'origine?
Est ce comparable avec ce que les Africains de France (ce petit pays a l'echelle des USA) RAPATRIENT chez eux?
Ce n'est pas pour autant que les USA, la Grande Bretagne ou le Japon m'immiscent dans ces mechanismes.
Voici la verite: la France a compris que la manne des immigrants vers leur pays d'origine, notamment en Afrique, est de loin superieur a l'aide au developpement. Or l'aide au developpement constitue une arnaque pour assujetir un pays pauvre a des conditionnalites qui plombe son developpement. Alors, la france cherche a controller ce mechanisme d'une facon ou d'une autre. Voici sa motivation.
tu parles, ca c'est de la parano et ki te dit que les autres pays ne font pa pareil? et les immigres au Japon ten as vu bcp?
Besson se dit simplement que de l argent bien invest par les meigres leur permettra de rentrer dans leur pays d origine.
virer l es immigres, that s the point.
Dites-moi en quoi les fonds rapatries par les immigres vers leur pays d'origine doivent-ils interesser la France?
Savez-vous combien de milliards de dollars sont rapatries chaque annee par les immigres grecs, juifs, turcs, kurdes, indiens et autres des Etats-Unis vers leurs pays d'origine?
Est ce comparable avec ce que les Africains de France (ce petit pays a l'echelle des USA) RAPATRIENT chez eux?
Ce n'est pas pour autant que les USA, la Grande Bretagne ou le Japon m'immiscent dans ces mechanismes.
Voici la verite: la France a compris que la manne des immigrants vers leur pays d'origine, notamment en Afrique, est de loin superieur a l'aide au developpement. Or l'aide au developpement constitue une arnaque pour assujetir un pays pauvre a des conditionnalites qui plombe son developpement. Alors, la france cherche a controller ce mechanisme d'une facon ou d'une autre. Voici sa motivation.
tu parles, ca c'est de la parano et ki te dit que les autres pays ne font pa pareil? et les immigres au Japon ten as vu bcp?
Besson se dit simplement que de l argent bien invest par les meigres leur permettra de rentrer dans leur pays d origine.
virer l es immigres, that s the point.
METTONS A PARALLÈLE UN SYSTÈME AVEC DES COMMERÇANTS DU PAYS. L ARGENT NE BOUGENT PAS ET LES COMMERÇANT ONT DES FOND SUR PLACE POUR ACHETER DES MARCHANDISES. ALLEZ COMMERÇANT NOUS SÉNÉGALAIS DE L EXTÉRIEUR NOUS VOUS LANÇONS UN DÉFI DE CRÉER VOS COMPTE ET DES CONTACTS DANS CHAQUE PAYS OU IL YA DES RESSORTISSANT DE VOTRE PAYS AFIN QUE DES ÉCHANGES SANS FRAIS SE PASSENT BIEN.
c'est nous africain qui gagnons notre propre argent, nous ne voulons aucune aide venant de qui que soit, a plus fort raison de la france. Notre argent ont sait bien comment le depenser. Si la france veut cooperer c'est de retenir son aide ça ne sert qu'a wade et sa famille, et tranferer la technologie./
Mon frere, la banque mondiale vient de publier les chiffres: les transferts de immigres dans leurs pays d'origines avoisinent 5 fois plus que les aides au developpement octroyees a ces pays. Donc, certains pays comme la France paniquent de savoir que tres bientot, les pays pauvres d'Afrique qu'ils exploitent n'auront plus besoin d'aide au developpement et en ce moment cela veut dire adieu les marches de dupe a la c.o.n qu'ils imposaient a ces pays pauvres avant d'octroyer l'aide au developpement. C'est leur facon et leur raison de voler les pauvres qui foutent le camp, donc il faut a tout prix controler ces flux financiers. Il n' ya pas d'autres raisons. Example: ce sont les immigres italiens des USA qui ont developpe la puissance qu'est l'Italie aujourdhui, il ya a peine 60 ans en envoyant massvement de l'argent dans leur pays. La France veille pour que cela n'arrive pas en Afrique.
je ne pense pas qu'il y'a qq chose de louche car il ne peuvent pas canaliser le contenu des envoies qui va aux familles mais l'argent qui tourne autours, les commissions. immagine toi je ss en italie et pour envoyer de l'argent au senegal en mode sure je dois pays environt 10pour cent a des societe comme wester union ou moneygram....qui sont en plus americains. 7 initiative ne p etre que benefique. meme s'il augmente les taxes!! pour l'afric!
Dites-moi en quoi les fonds rapatries par les immigres vers leur pays d'origine doivent-ils interesser la France?
Savez-vous combien de milliards de dollars sont rapatries chaque annee par les immigres grecs, juifs, turcs, kurdes, indiens et autres des Etats-Unis vers leurs pays d'origine?
Est ce comparable avec ce que les Africains de France (ce petit pays a l'echelle des USA) RAPATRIENT chez eux?
Ce n'est pas pour autant que les USA, la Grande Bretagne ou le Japon m'immiscent dans ces mechanismes.
Voici la verite: la France a compris que la manne des immigrants vers leur pays d'origine, notamment en Afrique, est de loin superieur a l'aide au developpement. Or l'aide au developpement constitue une arnaque pour assujetir un pays pauvre a des conditionnalites qui plombe son developpement. Alors, la france cherche a controller ce mechanisme d'une facon ou d'une autre. Voici sa motivation.
| | | | |
home > press release
WTO NEWS: 2006 PRESS RELEASES
Press/388
November 13, 2006
Listen to Voice of America broadcast about this proposal, Dec. 11, 2006
WTO Announces Formalized Slavery Model for Africa
US Trade Representative to Africa, Governor of Nigeria Central Bank weigh in at Wharton
SEE ALSO:
press releases
WTO news archives
Mike Moore's speeches
Important Note:
Many visitors from all over the political spectrum have read this release and believed it to mean that the WTO is officially in favor of slavery.
In actual fact, we at the WTO would never, ever wish to suggest that the modern version of the West's free trade with Africa is tantamount to its older form, slavery, or even worse than its other older form, colonialism. That would fly in the face of everything that we stand for.
The catastrophic failure of free-trade policies in Africa may be one partial source of this confusion. The actual, literal slavery that flourishes under the auspices of free trade (in Brazil, Jordan, and elsewhere) may be another.
Philadelphia - At a Wharton Business School conference on business in Africa, World Trade Organization representative Hanniford Schmidt announced the creation of a WTO initiative for "full private stewardry of labor" for the parts of Africa that have been hardest hit by the 500 years of Africa's free trade with the West.
The initiative will require Western companies doing business in some parts of Africa to own their workers outright. Schmidt recounted how private stewardship has been successfully applied to transport, power, water, traditional knowledge, and even the human genome. The WTO's "full private stewardry" program will extend these successes to (re)privatize humans themselves.
"Full, untrammelled stewardry is the best available solution to African poverty, and the inevitable result of free-market theory," Schmidt told more than 150 attendees. Schmidt acknowledged that the stewardry program was similar in many ways to slavery, but explained that just as "compassionate conservatism" has polished the rough edges on labor relations in industrialized countries, full stewardry, or "compassionate slavery," could be a similar boon to developing ones.
The audience included Prof. Charles Soludo (Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria), Dr. Laurie Ann Agama (Director for African Affairs at the Office of the US Trade Representative), and other notables. Agama prefaced her remarks by thanking Scmidt for his macroscopic perspective, saying that the USTR view adds details to the WTO's general approach. Nigerian Central Bank Governor Soludo also acknowledged the WTO proposal, though he did not seem to appreciate it as much as did Agama.
A system in which corporations own workers is the only free-market solution to African poverty, Schmidt said. "Today, in African factories, the only concern a company has for the worker is for his or her productive hours, and within his or her productive years," he said. "As soon as AIDS or pregnancy hits—out the door. Get sick, get fired. If you extend the employer's obligation to a 24/7, lifelong concern, you have an entirely different situation: get sick, get care. With each life valuable from start to finish, the AIDS scourge will be quickly contained via accords with drug manufacturers as a profitable investment in human stewardees. And educating a child for later might make more sense than working it to the bone right now."
To prove that human stewardry can work, Schmidt cited a proposal by a free-market think tank to save whales by selling them. "Those who don't like whaling can purchase rights to specific whales or groups of whales in order to stop those particular whales from getting whaled as much," he explained. Similarly, the market in Third-World humans will "empower" caring First Worlders to help them, Schmidt said.
One conference attendee asked what incentive employers had to remain as stewards once their employees are too old to work or reproduce. Schmidt responded that a large new biotech market would answer that worry. He then reminded the audience that this was the only possible solution under free-market theory.
There were no other questions from the audience that took issue with Schmidt's proposal.
During his talk, Schmidt outlined the three phases of Africa's 500-year history of free trade with the West: slavery, colonialism, and post-colonial markets. Each time, he noted, the trade has brought tremendous wealth to the West but catastrophe to Africa, with poverty steadily deepening and ever more millions of dead. "So far there's a pattern: Good for business, bad for people. Good for business, bad for people. Good for business, bad for people. That's why we're so happy to announce this fourth phase for business between Africa and the West: good for business—GOOD for people."
The conference took place on Saturday, November 11. The panel on which Schmidt spoke was entitled "Trade in Africa: Enhancing Relationships to Improve Net Worth." Some of the other panels in the conference were entitled "Re-Branding Africa" and "Growing Africa's Appetite." Throughout the comments by Schmidt and his three co-panelists, which lasted 75 minutes, Schmidt's stewardee, Thomas Bongani-Nkemdilim, remained standing at respectful attention off to the side.
"This is what free trade's all about," said Schmidt. "It's about the freedom to buy and sell anything—even people."
US Trade Representative follows up on WTO comments
as WTO assistant looks on
Selling whales saves whales, and the same can be applied
to poor Africans
WTO and assistant fraternize with US Trade Representative
to Africa
WTO's Schmidt and colleague visit historic Philadelphia
CONTACT US : World Trade Organization, rue de Lausanne 154, CH-1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland
Dites-moi en quoi les fonds rapatries par les immigres vers leur pays d'origine doivent-ils interesser la France?
Savez-vous combien de milliards de dollars sont rapatries chaque annee par les immigres grecs, juifs, turcs, kurdes, indiens et autres des Etats-Unis vers leurs pays d'origine?
Est ce comparable avec ce que les Africains de France (ce petit pays a l'echelle des USA) RAPATRIENT chez eux?
Ce n'est pas pour autant que les USA, la Grande Bretagne ou le Japon m'immiscent dans ces mechanismes.
Voici la verite: la France a compris que la manne des immigrants vers leur pays d'origine, notamment en Afrique, est de loin superieur a l'aide au developpement. Or l'aide au developpement constitue une arnaque pour assujetir un pays pauvre a des conditionnalites qui plombe son developpement. Alors, la france cherche a controller ce mechanisme d'une facon ou d'une autre. Voici sa motivation.
| | | | |
home > press release
WTO NEWS: 2006 PRESS RELEASES
Press/388
November 13, 2006
Listen to Voice of America broadcast about this proposal, Dec. 11, 2006
WTO Announces Formalized Slavery Model for Africa
US Trade Representative to Africa, Governor of Nigeria Central Bank weigh in at Wharton
SEE ALSO:
press releases
WTO news archives
Mike Moore's speeches
Important Note:
Many visitors from all over the political spectrum have read this release and believed it to mean that the WTO is officially in favor of slavery.
In actual fact, we at the WTO would never, ever wish to suggest that the modern version of the West's free trade with Africa is tantamount to its older form, slavery, or even worse than its other older form, colonialism. That would fly in the face of everything that we stand for.
The catastrophic failure of free-trade policies in Africa may be one partial source of this confusion. The actual, literal slavery that flourishes under the auspices of free trade (in Brazil, Jordan, and elsewhere) may be another.
Philadelphia - At a Wharton Business School conference on business in Africa, World Trade Organization representative Hanniford Schmidt announced the creation of a WTO initiative for "full private stewardry of labor" for the parts of Africa that have been hardest hit by the 500 years of Africa's free trade with the West.
The initiative will require Western companies doing business in some parts of Africa to own their workers outright. Schmidt recounted how private stewardship has been successfully applied to transport, power, water, traditional knowledge, and even the human genome. The WTO's "full private stewardry" program will extend these successes to (re)privatize humans themselves.
"Full, untrammelled stewardry is the best available solution to African poverty, and the inevitable result of free-market theory," Schmidt told more than 150 attendees. Schmidt acknowledged that the stewardry program was similar in many ways to slavery, but explained that just as "compassionate conservatism" has polished the rough edges on labor relations in industrialized countries, full stewardry, or "compassionate slavery," could be a similar boon to developing ones.
The audience included Prof. Charles Soludo (Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria), Dr. Laurie Ann Agama (Director for African Affairs at the Office of the US Trade Representative), and other notables. Agama prefaced her remarks by thanking Scmidt for his macroscopic perspective, saying that the USTR view adds details to the WTO's general approach. Nigerian Central Bank Governor Soludo also acknowledged the WTO proposal, though he did not seem to appreciate it as much as did Agama.
A system in which corporations own workers is the only free-market solution to African poverty, Schmidt said. "Today, in African factories, the only concern a company has for the worker is for his or her productive hours, and within his or her productive years," he said. "As soon as AIDS or pregnancy hits—out the door. Get sick, get fired. If you extend the employer's obligation to a 24/7, lifelong concern, you have an entirely different situation: get sick, get care. With each life valuable from start to finish, the AIDS scourge will be quickly contained via accords with drug manufacturers as a profitable investment in human stewardees. And educating a child for later might make more sense than working it to the bone right now."
To prove that human stewardry can work, Schmidt cited a proposal by a free-market think tank to save whales by selling them. "Those who don't like whaling can purchase rights to specific whales or groups of whales in order to stop those particular whales from getting whaled as much," he explained. Similarly, the market in Third-World humans will "empower" caring First Worlders to help them, Schmidt said.
One conference attendee asked what incentive employers had to remain as stewards once their employees are too old to work or reproduce. Schmidt responded that a large new biotech market would answer that worry. He then reminded the audience that this was the only possible solution under free-market theory.
There were no other questions from the audience that took issue with Schmidt's proposal.
During his talk, Schmidt outlined the three phases of Africa's 500-year history of free trade with the West: slavery, colonialism, and post-colonial markets. Each time, he noted, the trade has brought tremendous wealth to the West but catastrophe to Africa, with poverty steadily deepening and ever more millions of dead. "So far there's a pattern: Good for business, bad for people. Good for business, bad for people. Good for business, bad for people. That's why we're so happy to announce this fourth phase for business between Africa and the West: good for business—GOOD for people."
The conference took place on Saturday, November 11. The panel on which Schmidt spoke was entitled "Trade in Africa: Enhancing Relationships to Improve Net Worth." Some of the other panels in the conference were entitled "Re-Branding Africa" and "Growing Africa's Appetite." Throughout the comments by Schmidt and his three co-panelists, which lasted 75 minutes, Schmidt's stewardee, Thomas Bongani-Nkemdilim, remained standing at respectful attention off to the side.
"This is what free trade's all about," said Schmidt. "It's about the freedom to buy and sell anything—even people."
US Trade Representative follows up on WTO comments
as WTO assistant looks on
Selling whales saves whales, and the same can be applied
to poor Africans
WTO and assistant fraternize with US Trade Representative
to Africa
WTO's Schmidt and colleague visit historic Philadelphia
CONTACT US : World Trade Organization, rue de Lausanne 154, CH-1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland
Reveiilez mes chers freres et soeurs Africains ! Ne laisser ni la France, ni la BAD, ni le FIDA controler les mechanismes de tranfert des fonds des immigres vers leur pays d'origine. C'est une arnaque et c'est une tactique interessee de la France, cette nation pie-voleuse caracterisee par ses intrigues malefiques, pour controler les fonds qui entrent dans nos pays pour les assujetir a des conditionalites fiscales et monetaires (voire le minable mechanisme de retention des exportations des pays membres de la ZONE Franc CFA (BCEAO, BEAC, BANQUE DE COMORES, DJIBOUTI ET MADASGASCAR). La France vient de constater que les transferts des migrants Africains vont sauver les finances de ses pays et elle veut saper ces mechanismes. Ne soyons plus naifs, les transferts sont bons comme ils sont, la competition emanant des africains eux-memes dans ce secteur reglera le probleme des couts. Mefiance.
| | | | |
home > press release
WTO NEWS: 2006 PRESS RELEASES
Press/388
November 13, 2006
Listen to Voice of America broadcast about this proposal, Dec. 11, 2006
WTO Announces Formalized Slavery Model for Africa
US Trade Representative to Africa, Governor of Nigeria Central Bank weigh in at Wharton
SEE ALSO:
press releases
WTO news archives
Mike Moore's speeches
Important Note:
Many visitors from all over the political spectrum have read this release and believed it to mean that the WTO is officially in favor of slavery.
In actual fact, we at the WTO would never, ever wish to suggest that the modern version of the West's free trade with Africa is tantamount to its older form, slavery, or even worse than its other older form, colonialism. That would fly in the face of everything that we stand for.
The catastrophic failure of free-trade policies in Africa may be one partial source of this confusion. The actual, literal slavery that flourishes under the auspices of free trade (in Brazil, Jordan, and elsewhere) may be another.
Philadelphia - At a Wharton Business School conference on business in Africa, World Trade Organization representative Hanniford Schmidt announced the creation of a WTO initiative for "full private stewardry of labor" for the parts of Africa that have been hardest hit by the 500 years of Africa's free trade with the West.
The initiative will require Western companies doing business in some parts of Africa to own their workers outright. Schmidt recounted how private stewardship has been successfully applied to transport, power, water, traditional knowledge, and even the human genome. The WTO's "full private stewardry" program will extend these successes to (re)privatize humans themselves.
"Full, untrammelled stewardry is the best available solution to African poverty, and the inevitable result of free-market theory," Schmidt told more than 150 attendees. Schmidt acknowledged that the stewardry program was similar in many ways to slavery, but explained that just as "compassionate conservatism" has polished the rough edges on labor relations in industrialized countries, full stewardry, or "compassionate slavery," could be a similar boon to developing ones.
The audience included Prof. Charles Soludo (Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria), Dr. Laurie Ann Agama (Director for African Affairs at the Office of the US Trade Representative), and other notables. Agama prefaced her remarks by thanking Scmidt for his macroscopic perspective, saying that the USTR view adds details to the WTO's general approach. Nigerian Central Bank Governor Soludo also acknowledged the WTO proposal, though he did not seem to appreciate it as much as did Agama.
A system in which corporations own workers is the only free-market solution to African poverty, Schmidt said. "Today, in African factories, the only concern a company has for the worker is for his or her productive hours, and within his or her productive years," he said. "As soon as AIDS or pregnancy hits—out the door. Get sick, get fired. If you extend the employer's obligation to a 24/7, lifelong concern, you have an entirely different situation: get sick, get care. With each life valuable from start to finish, the AIDS scourge will be quickly contained via accords with drug manufacturers as a profitable investment in human stewardees. And educating a child for later might make more sense than working it to the bone right now."
To prove that human stewardry can work, Schmidt cited a proposal by a free-market think tank to save whales by selling them. "Those who don't like whaling can purchase rights to specific whales or groups of whales in order to stop those particular whales from getting whaled as much," he explained. Similarly, the market in Third-World humans will "empower" caring First Worlders to help them, Schmidt said.
One conference attendee asked what incentive employers had to remain as stewards once their employees are too old to work or reproduce. Schmidt responded that a large new biotech market would answer that worry. He then reminded the audience that this was the only possible solution under free-market theory.
There were no other questions from the audience that took issue with Schmidt's proposal.
During his talk, Schmidt outlined the three phases of Africa's 500-year history of free trade with the West: slavery, colonialism, and post-colonial markets. Each time, he noted, the trade has brought tremendous wealth to the West but catastrophe to Africa, with poverty steadily deepening and ever more millions of dead. "So far there's a pattern: Good for business, bad for people. Good for business, bad for people. Good for business, bad for people. That's why we're so happy to announce this fourth phase for business between Africa and the West: good for business—GOOD for people."
The conference took place on Saturday, November 11. The panel on which Schmidt spoke was entitled "Trade in Africa: Enhancing Relationships to Improve Net Worth." Some of the other panels in the conference were entitled "Re-Branding Africa" and "Growing Africa's Appetite." Throughout the comments by Schmidt and his three co-panelists, which lasted 75 minutes, Schmidt's stewardee, Thomas Bongani-Nkemdilim, remained standing at respectful attention off to the side.
"This is what free trade's all about," said Schmidt. "It's about the freedom to buy and sell anything—even people."
US Trade Representative follows up on WTO comments
as WTO assistant looks on
Selling whales saves whales, and the same can be applied
to poor Africans
WTO and assistant fraternize with US Trade Representative
to Africa
WTO's Schmidt and colleague visit historic Philadelphia
CONTACT US : World Trade Organization, rue de Lausanne 154, CH-1211 Geneva 21, Switzerland
Ce fonds, du point de vue des signataires de l’accord, c’est un peu d’huile dans les rouages du transfert d’argent. Il permettrait de limiter les taxes perçues dans les opérations de transfert et de créer des structures alternatives pour induire une concurrence. Enfin il permettrait à l’argent de la diaspora d’être plus accessible au monde rural. 
Commentaires
:
Repondre
boma bayiwoul 
Plus de grands titres
:
Il n'y a pas meilleur signe des temps, pour ceux qui en comprennent toute la symbolique, que la désaffection récente de Serigne Mamoune Niasse et son retour dans l'opposition. Elle vaut pour moi plus que le rapprochement, lui aussi significatif, entre Abdoulaye Makhtar Diop et le Parti socialiste. Le retour des deux grands ténors de scène politique nationale, tous deux anciens du Parti socialiste, n'est pas une victoire que doivent savourer Moustapha Niasse et Ousmane Tanor Dieng. 
Se souvient-on de Fatou Kassé, Mada Thiam, Ndiol
Niang, Saloum Dieng?
