Les Africains cuisinent Barack Obama par SMS
Commentaires
:
| Auteur: kor adee |
|
Posté
le : 2009-07-06 02:50:05 |
|
 |
Ralph Peters
Retired Army Officer, Author, Strategist and New York
Post
Opinion Columnist
Je n’aime pas trop le “New York Post†comme “Fox Newsâ€
d’ailleurs, mais ce columnist savait de quoi il
parlait. Je m’excuse pour ceux qui ne comprennent pas
l’Anglais. Si j’ai un peu de temps je pourrais traduire
ce texte pour eux. Pour tous ceux qui se demandent
pourquoi Obama va visiter le Ghana et non pas le Kenya
ou le Senegal ou un autre pays Africain voici la
reponse. Tout comme le Kenya autrefois, l’idee que le
Ghana est democratique est une “fabrication†d’une
pensee venant de l’Ouest qui compare nos pays aux leurs
dans une totale et “voulue†ignorance de nos
arrangements sociaux. Aussi longtemps que le systeme
interne et les acteurs politique d’un pays africain
accepteront de se conformer a cette “democratieâ€
choisie pour eux, ce pays la restera meritoire aux yeux
de l’occident. Hier c’etait le Kenya, ou a un degre
moindre; le senegal. Aujourd’hui, c’est le Ghana. Bonne
lecture si vous en avez le courage.
BEHIND THE CHAOS IN KENYA
Odinga: Real winner of prez election.
January 30, 2008
A MONTH ago, Kenya's President Mwai Kibaki brazenly
stole a national election, abruptly reversing the
nation's progress toward a mature democracy. Violence
since Election Day has taken nearly 1,000 lives and
left a quarter-million homeless.
Now a legislator allied with Raila Odinga - the man who
actually won the election - has been assassinated. The
police and military have been unable to contain the
savagery in the streets.
First, Odinga's outraged backers ethnically cleansed
members of Kibaki's tribe, the Kikuyus. Then put-upon
Kikuyus struck back, driving out Odinga's Luo and other
minority tribes. Spontaneous rage coalesced into
organized purges. Ex-UN chief Kofi Annan's attempts to
reach a compromise continue to fail.
But it's not only corrupt local pols who are to blame.
Kenya's sudden nightmare is also the fault of pompous
Western theorists and impossibly arrogant diplomats.
(Our embassy in Nairobi's botched response to the
stolen election alienated both sides in turn.)
The horrific violence in Kenya has its roots in three
things: the corruption we overlook, the forms of
democracy we demand - and, above all, the tribes that
left-wing academics insist are only wicked European
inventions.
Our tolerance for corruption (our ambassador initially
hailed Kibaki's "victory") may be the most pernicious
remaining form of racism - our all-too-ready acceptance
that developing countries just can't rise above it. And
corruption is a cancer that infects every organ of a
society.
At least we grasp, on some level, that corruption is
wrong. It's the other two factors - ill-fitting forms
of democracy and the persistence of tribes - that steer
our good intentions into the express lane to Hell.
Kenya was long one of the continent's few stable states
- yet people there kept on voting along tribal lines.
As they do in Iraq. And Afghanistan. And Pakistan,
Indonesia, Nigeria . . . just throw a dart at the map.
ImposeWestern forms of democracy, and majority or
plurality tribes win - then view their victories as
license to loot. It doesn't even occur to them to
share.
The process has played out hundreds of times, in dozens
of countries, but we still insist that democracy means
"one citizen, one vote" for a central government with
Western-style ministries. The model we've enforced
around the world assumes that enlightened citizens
won't be bound by tribal or religious loyalties.
But they are. So, in a country where an alpha tribe has
the clout to dominate at the polls, a democracy that
fails to formally apportion power among a country's
various ethnic and religious factions just doesn't
work.
Our type of democracy works in homogeneous countries,
such as Sweden or the Netherlands, where campaigns are
strictly about issues - or in countries, like our own,
that are so diverse no "alpha tribe" can lord it over
everybody else.
But democracy as we know it doesn't work in countries
where competition for resources persists along tribal
or religious lines. (Kenya also has a Christian-Muslim
fracture, though it's not at the forefront now.)
At the bottom of virtually every electoral mess in the
developing world are indestructible identities that
Western academics long insisted didn't exist. In the
20th century, no end of professors declared that
differences in ethnicity, tradition, language and
perceived identity were all in our heads: European
imperialists had created tribes to screw up Eden.
But our attempts to ride roughshod over fundamental
identities to which human beings cling for dear life
only resulted in the sort of failures we've witnessed
in the post-colonial years - and the problems we faced
in Iraq as we brushed aside sheiks in favor of corrupt
bureaucrats.
To make democracy work in the developing world, you
must adapt it to the pre-existing social structures and
traditional loyalties, rather than assuming they'll
wither away at the first election. Even Stalin couldn't
finish off the Chechens. Afghanistan's Pathans won't
vote for Tadjiks, or Sunni Arabs for Sunni Kurds.
The utterly wrong-headed and ultimately deadly
insistence that everybody is just like us has led us to
prescribe poison: In tribal societies, Western-style
presidential or parliamentary systems produce, at best,
authoritarian regimes. (As I argued years ago, our
question in 2003 shouldn't have been "How do we bring
our democracy to Iraq?" but "What would an Iraqi
democracy look like?")
The immediate cause of Kenya's brutal street murders,
slum rampages and neighborhood purges is a stolen
election that cheated those who hoped democracy would
finally work for their tribes. In the simplest terms,
one tribe stole from the others. Now there's tribal
warfare.
When we in the West analyze our own societies, we start
with the individual and extrapolate to the mass. In
tribal societies, whether in Africa, the Middle East or
the Subcontinent, you must begin with the mass and work
down.
We vote our individual consciences. In much of the
world, that's unthinkable: You vote for your own kind.
Until we see the world as it is, rather than as we wish
it to be, elections will tear tribal societies apart -
as in Kenya today. The problem isn't democracy. It's
"one size fits all" democracy.
deephearth@hotmail.com
|
|
|