The text, voted on in Accra, pits defenders of family values against human rights organizations and diplomatic concerns.

The Ghanaian parliament has passed a new and highly controversial bill targeting LGBTQ activities. The bill provides for prison sentences of up to ten years for those accused of promoting, financing, or supporting LGBTQ activities.

The vote took place on Friday, May 29, 2026 in Accra. The text, known as the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, reignites a profound debate in Ghana, between the defense of family values claimed by its supporters, concerns of human rights organizations and the risk of diplomatic tensions.

According to information released after the vote, the law aims to punish not only certain sexual acts already criminalized in the country, but also the promotion, support, funding, or public defense of LGBTQ activities. Penalties vary depending on the case, with harsher sentences for forms of organization, campaigning, or support presented as “promotion.”

A text that has already been debated for several years

Ghana had already experienced a similar debate in 2024. An earlier version of the legislation had been adopted by Parliament, but former President Nana Akufo-Addo did not sign it into law before the end of his term. The matter remained unresolved due to legal proceedings, political pressure, and international criticism.

With John Dramani Mahama's return to the presidency, the bill's proponents have relaunched their campaign. The president has already hinted that he supports the idea of a law more strictly regulating these issues, although the final promulgation remains a political step to be closely monitored.

Supporters of the bill argue that it is designed to protect Ghana's culture, religion, and family values. They claim to be responding to strong social demand in a country where churches, religious leaders, and several conservative groups have campaigned for stricter legislation.

Human rights defenders are worried

Conversely, several human rights organizations believe that the text threatens fundamental freedoms. They are particularly concerned about the potential effects on freedom of expression, freedom of association, access to healthcare, and the safety of LGBTQ people or those perceived as such.

The debate extends beyond Ghana's borders. In the past, international institutions have already warned of the risk that this type of legislation could affect the country's relations with certain donors. The issue is sensitive because Ghana is gradually emerging from a difficult economic period and remains committed to financial support programs with international partners.

The vote comes in a regional context where several African countries have hardened their stance on LGBTQ issues. Supporters of the legislation see it as an affirmation of cultural sovereignty. Critics, on the other hand, speak of a setback for civil liberties and a worrying signal for minorities.

The next step will be the official position of the presidency. If the text is signed, it could become one of the strictest laws in West Africa on LGBTQ activities and open a new political, legal, and diplomatic chapter for Accra.