Système de rémunération dans la fonction publique : un syndicaliste décèle des disparités criantes
The Senegalese civil service remuneration system today presents glaring disparities that undermine republican equity and undermine the cohesion of the State Corps, according to Saliou Mbaye. Indeed, for several decades, underlines the coordinator of the union unit of the autonomous union of secondary school teachers of Senegal (SAEMSS), successive governments, guided by electoral logic and short-term compromises, have established a fragmented salary system, favoring certain agents to the detriment of others who are nevertheless housed in the same hierarchy.
However, he recalls, Law No. 61-33 of June 15, 1961 is explicit: the administrative hierarchy must be the sole criterion for setting salaries. This principle, which was supposed to guarantee objective and incontestable equality of treatment, has nevertheless been circumvented by ad hoc measures, often intended to satisfy targeted groups, which has accentuated the fractures within the Civil Service, writes Saliou Mbaye, Deputy Regional Secretary General for Press and Communication.
In this regard, he indicates, the example of the Teaching Framework perfectly illustrates this inequity with the case of teachers who, after obtaining their professional diplomas, generally have to wait many years before being granted tenure or hired. In addition, he continues, reminders of integration, validation or promotion are chronically delayed, as are the payment of travel, marking, monitoring and secretarial expenses for exams and competitions.
Mr. Mbaye raised the case of decision-makers who remain in an uncertain administrative situation. ''However, these non-civil servant colleagues play a central role in the education of citizens and the influence of the country.
For the unionist, it is not a question of contesting the legitimate gains obtained by the unions or other sectors of the Administration but rather of specifying that social justice requires equal treatment between all public agents of the same Hierarchy. Consequently, he concludes, the State, guarantor of the general interest, must apply the regulatory and statutory texts rigorously, so that remuneration becomes once again an instrument of equity and not a tool of segmentation.
Commentaires (6)
Bonne analyse.
Oui pour la correction
Surtout le cas des decisionnaires.
Le PASTEF au pouvoir, Monsieur le Président de la République et son Gouvernement, Messieurs les Députés (majorité absolue qualifiée du PASTEF) vous ne pouvez pas vous n'avez pas le droit de faire les morts devant cette promesse de rétablir l'équité et l'égalité dans la Fonction Publique...supprimez annulez les avantages indus et injustifiés actuels et revenez à l'orthodoxie de toutes les fonctions publiques du monde
Il n'y a pas d'inégalité dans le traitement des agents de l'état. Les salaires sont alignés à la hiérarchie et à la grille indiciaire. Seuls les indemnités varient d'un corps à l'autre.
Article vide! Aucune donnée arythmetique
Participer à la Discussion